|
Categories
Latest Postings
Links
Archives
|
Author ArchiveDemocratic Party News - The list of crimes for impeaching Barack Obama keep growing.5. September 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
We are not surprized the list of crimes for impeaching Barack Obama keep growing, or that a new Congressional Report Lists 36 Pages of Obama’s Crimes. Congressman Darrell Issa has produced a shocking new report detailing the Obama administration’s extensive use of taxpayer-funded propaganda, which he says breaks federal law. The report created for the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform details how the former Alinskyite community organizer has channeled the resources of the federal government — that is, your money — to create “a sophisticated propaganda and lobbying campaign” made up of “inappropriate and sometimes unlawful public relations and propaganda initiatives.” The highlights include: Using federal arts grants to spread Obama’s legislative message. Last August 10, administration officials held a conference call with National Endowment of the Arts grant recipients. Buffy Wicks, a college radical who worked in Valerie Jarrett‘s Office of Public Engagement, told the invitees, “we’re going to come at you with some specific ‘asks’ here,” specifically supporting Obama’s initiatives on health care, the environment, or energy. She suggested, “We wanted folks to connect…with federal agencies, with labor unions, progressive groups, face groups [faith groups, perhaps?], women’s groups, you name it.” Within 48 hours, no fewer than 21 arts organizations released a statement endorsing ObamaCare. The Dept. of Health and Human Services paid MIT economist Jonathan Gruber nearly $400,000 for various jobs. He did not disclose his employment by HHS while writing a string of op-eds, nor while testifying before the Senate in favor of, ObamaCare. The Justice Dept. hired Tracy Russo, the former blogger for John Edwards, to comment on internet articles or bulletin board messages that criticized Barack Obama and his agenda. She did this anonymously or used a pen name. A Dept. of Education officer used the White House email to send his colleagues eight bullet points to “communicate the merits of the President’s proposal with your members and their audiences.” The federal government “highly recommended” constructing highway signs that tout big government and advertise politicians (including Obama). (Watch the committee’s video on the subject here.) Obama attempted to enlist “voluntary” Hollywood propaganda for his proposals through the iParticipate campaign. Andy Griffith starred in a Medicare “update” that doubled as a commercial for Obama’s health care legislation. Not only is the PSAl propaganda, it is erroneous. A writer with the nonpartisan FactCheck.org remarked Griffith’s scripted “promise that ‘benefits will remain the same’ is just as fictional as the town of Mayberry.” The White House routinely drove traffic to websites that lobby for Obama’s legislation. Futhermore, Congressman Issa cites three separate federal statutes violated by the Obama administration and has called for a Government Accountability Office (GAO) to launch an investigation. If violations of the law are found, impeachment could follow. Please take the time to read the full report by clicking here. Posted in Impeach Obama, Corruption And Lies, President Obama, Democratic Party, Politics | Comments Off Democratic Party News - The biggest assault on American Freedom and Liberty in US history.2. September 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
Now that Americans are awake and confronting their tyrannical employees in the federal government, who are clearly hell-bent upon forcing a Marxist agenda, it’s time to name names so that the people easily identify who is directly responsible for the biggest assault on American freedom and liberty in US history. After decades of failed attempts to take over America via their third party initiatives that couldn’t break America’s two party system, leaders of both the Communist Party USA and Socialist Party USA chose a new strategy. Both being the ultimate “party of the working class stiff,” they joined forces in a new venture that would work within the US two party system, by hijacking control of one of the two primary parties. As the Democrat Party had already spent years identifying itself as the “party of the working class,” engaging in socio-economic class warfare as its primary method for expanding its political power, it was ripe for the hijacking. Together, Communist Party and Socialist Party leaders established the Democratic Socialists of America, and they share a common ideology which is now the platform and mantra of today’s DNC - CPUSA Insert the word “Democrats” where “Communists” appears in this statement, and you have the central message of today’s Democrat leadership. To gain full control of the Democrat Party, DSA leadership established two congressional legislative bodies, headed by DSA/CPUSA/SPUSA members. Today, these are the two congressional bodies in control of congress. They are the Congressional Progressive Caucus established by Socialist Party member Bernie Sanders of Vermont, and the Congressional Black Caucus established by Communist Party member John Conyers of Michigan. ALL members of these two congressional committees represent the Democratic Socialists of America, as both committees are the creation of, and operate under the control of DSAUSA. If you want to know who is behind the full-court press to nationalize or socialize health care, the auto industry, banking and insurance, here they are…. Is YOUR congress member on these lists? To be sure, they are not the only problem is congress or Washington DC today, but every anti-American policy initiative coming out of Washington DC today, is rooted in this organization and proposed by their members of congress, the members of their two committees. As American citizens wake up to the reality that their nation, their personal freedom and liberty are under attack on many fronts today, they must focus on the root of that evil, Americans who have lost their faith in freedom and liberty, and bought the false promise of secular socialism and the right of the Fed to confiscate the freedom of one, to purchase the voting power of another. Ten minutes of history research will quickly confirm that communism, socialism, Marxism, totalitarianism, are all systems by which the governing few are empowered, not the masses. Even though many Americans have been tricked into thinking that their lives are better off in the hands of Washington DC elitists, the vast majority of Americans Inherently know better! Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus Members of the Congressional Black Caucus If your members of congress appear on either of the two member lists above, they ARE part of the “conspiracy” to destroy everything America has ever been, or was ever intended to be. They are opponents of freedom, plain and simple. If you still have no clue what we are up against, go one step further and take a look at the website: http://www.commieblaster.com . Posted in Marxist Radicals, Communist Radicals, Marxist Government, Marxism, Communist, Communist Party, Socialist Party, Progressivism, Progressives, Democratic Party, Constitution Violations, President Obama, Socialism In America, Candidates - 2010, Corruption And Lies, Politics | Comments Off Democratic Party News - Vote the Progressive Socialists out of Congress.1. September 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
The Socialists (so called Progressives) have taken over our Democratic Party, including a small portion of the Republican Party. They have no allegiance to our Democratic Party, or our way of life as free Americans. Their sole agenda is based on transforming our Nation into a Mao and Marxist type of government. The Socialist Party of America announced in their newsletter that 70 Congressional democrats currently belong to their caucus. American Socialist Voter– Question: How many members of the U.S. Congress are also members of the DSA? Question: How many of the DSA members sit on the Judiciary Committee? Question: Who are these members of 111th Congress? Co-Chairs: Vice Chairs: Senate Members: House Members: Posted in Nancy Pelosi, Marxist Government, Communist Radicals, Marxist Radicals, Communist, Marxism, Progressivism, Progressives, Democratic Party, Constitution Violations, Socialism In America, Corruption And Lies, Candidates - 2010, Federal Government, Politics | Comments Off Democratic Party News - More on the Politics of Progressive Socialists.1. September 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
We are the Progressives, and you will be assimilated. Your government and individual distinctiveness will be added to ours. Resistance is futile.Some of you may laugh at the above, but truth is stranger than fiction. For instance, our President, Barack Obama, was a member of a radical communist party, called the Illinois New Party and/or the Chicago New Party, which has Chicago Mob and Black Communist Activist roots. He admits receiving Marxist training (Marxism is the ideology of using law as a means of oppression and control). Obama has friends whose terrorist organization bombed the US Capital, the Pentagon and the State Department, killed policemen and were planing to kill 25 million people. More importantly, these people may be agents of Cuba or Russia. Obama has surrounded himself with socialists-communists of similar backgrounds and has built and is building a shadow government of communists-socialists-progressives-radicals to bypass Congressional and Citizen control. As elected leader of our country, he regularly meets with large labor unions led by known communists. He worked for an international communist organization, ACORN, now under investigation by the FBI and others. As a marxist-trained socialist and apparent narcissist, Obama’s primary goals are to eliminate capitalism and replace it with a socialist-marxist-communist program, perhaps under the direction of the Soviet Union who has been our enemy for over 50 years. Obama’s policies are leaving our nation open to attack and infiltration by communists and terrorists of dictator countries and his initiatives will collapse the US financial system as it forces us to obtain huge financial loans from other countries like communist China. Obama made the Top Ten List of Corrupt Politicians in 2007, 2008 and 2009, with “Dishonorable Mention” on the 2006 List. The US House of Representatives is being led by a majority of Progressives (i.e., documented Socialists and Communists). Its Majority Leader, Nancy Pelosi, is also a Progressive-Socialist-Communist who made the Top Ten List of Corrupt politicians in 2007, 2008 and 2009. Of the 435 House members, at least 80 are Progressive (Socialist-Communist) Democrats, about 59 are members of the New Democrat Coalition, and about 52 are Blue Dog Democrats. Some identified as non-Progressive Democrats are actually socialists. As CBS News reported, Progressives follow Mao (NBC report example: Congressman Bobby Rush) is a Progressive Representatives, involved in crime, corruption and blocking investigations into their progressive associates and their crimes. Progressives attempted to enter and refocus our US census and voting process via ACORN. Many of these socialist/communist US House of Representatives members travel to Communist Cuba frequently and meet with the Castro brothers and associates of a US-convicted Cuban spy ring. They have changed US laws to allow enable money transfer, travel and better communications with Communist Cuba and many openly praise mass murderers Fidel Castro and Che Guevara. They are working to make it easier for illegal immigrants to enter our country so they can expand their control of America via labor unions. The goal is transforming tens of millions of illegal aliens into communist union members who will vote as a block and increase communist transition funding via annual union dues. Their policies are not “freedom of religion”, but rather “no religion”. They are implementing budget-busting initiatives to redistribute wealth and convert the USA to a socialist communism state. Their current policies will collapse our US financial system. Posted in Marxist Radicals, Marxism, What is Socialism?, Communist, Marxist Government, Progressivism, Democratic Party, President Obama, Candidates - 2010, Progressives, Politics | Comments Off Democratic Party News - Presidential Assassination Program.20. July 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
American citizens are targeted for killings far away from any battlefield, based exclusively on unchecked accusations of Obama and his Executive Branch that they’re involved in Terrorism. Obama’s Director of National Intelligence, Adm. Dennis Blair, acknowledged in Congressional testimony that Obama and his administration reserves the “right” to carry out such assassinations. In other words, no due process is accorded. No charges or trials are necessary. No evidence is offered, nor any opportunity for the accused to deny these accusations. Instead, in Barack Obama’s America, the way guilt is determined for American citizens — and a death penalty imposed — is that the President, like the King he thinks he is, secretly decrees someone’s guilt as a Terrorist. And the execution is thus decreed: American citizen will now be murdered by the CIA because Barack Obama has ordered that it be done. What kind of person could possibly justify this or think that this is a legitimate government power? Just to get a sense of how extreme this behavior is, Antonin Scalia, in the 2004 case of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, wrote an Opinion (joined by Justice Stevens) arguing that it was unconstitutional for the U.S. Government merely to imprison (let alone kill) American citizens as “enemy combatants”; instead, they argued, the Constitution required that Americans be charged with crimes (such as treason) and be given a trial before being punished. The full Hamdi Court held that at least some due process was required before Americans could be imprisoned as “enemy combatants.” Yet now, Barack Obama is claiming the right not merely to imprison, but to assassinate far from any battlefield, American citizens with no due process of any kind. Even GOP Congressman Pete Hoekstra, when questioning Adm. Blair, recognized the severe dangers raised by this asserted power. Now what about all the progressives within our Democratic Party that screamed for years about the Bush administration’s tyrannical treatment of Jose Padilla? Bush merely imprisoned Padilla for years without a trial. If that’s a vicious, tyrannical assault on the Constitution — and it was — what should they be saying about the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s assassination of American citizens without any due process? Ask yourself, “Does this sound like an American President, or the work of a Dictator?” Posted in Progressivism, Marxism, Domestic Policy, Progressives, Socialism In America, Democratic Party, President Obama, WakeUp America, Constitution Violations | 4 Comments » Democratic Party News - Obama Scares Me.19. July 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
By Lou Pritchett, Procter & Gamble A LETTER FROM A PROCTER AND GAMBLE EXECUTIVE TO THE PRESIDENT* THE LAST SENTENCE IS THE MOST CHILLING Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America’s true living legends- an acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world’s highest rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize him as the foremost leader in change management.. Lou changed the way America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to be known as “partnering.” Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history. AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA Dear President Obama: You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me. You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you. You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support. You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American. You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll. You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don’t understand it at its core. You scare me because you lack humility and ‘class’, always blaming others. You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail. You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the ‘blame America ‘ crowd and deliver this message abroad. You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector. You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one. You scare me because you prefer ‘wind mills’ to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves. You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world. You scare me because you have begun to use ‘extortion’ tactics against certain banks and corporations. You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals. You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people. You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient. You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do. You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaugh’s, Hannitys, O’Reillys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view. You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing. Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years. Lou Pritchett Posted in Corruption And Lies, WakeUp America, President Obama, Democratic Party, Politics | 3 Comments » Democratic Party News - Articles of Impeachment.19. July 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
Can we actually impeach Barack Hussein Obama? Should we impeach Barack Hussein Obama? To borrow a phrase from the “anointed-one,” … “yes we can.” But before going on, we really need to address the often misunderstood subject of what exactly constitutes an impeachable offense, in order to illustrate that Barack Obama’s actions are grave enough to warrant impeachment. Former-President Gerald Ford, while serving in the House of Representatives, said an impeachable offense was, “whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.” Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution reads: “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.” The key phrase here is “high crimes and misdemeanors,” a concept in English Common Law that was well-known to our Founding Fathers but is grossly misunderstood in this day and age. “High crimes and misdemeanors” essentially means bad behavior. Here’s a passage from C-Span.org which succinctly and beautifully summarizes the historical significance surrounding the inclusion of the term “high crimes and misdemeanors” in the Constitution: “’High crimes and misdemeanors’ entered the text of the Constitution due to George Mason and James Madison. Mason had argued that the reasons given for impeachment – treason and bribery – were not enough. He worried that other “great and dangerous offenses” might not be covered… so Mason then proposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanors,’ a phrase well-known in English common law. In 18th century language, a ‘misdemeanor’ meant ‘mis-demeanor,’ or bad behavior.” In other words, “high crimes and misdemeanors” does not refer to a criminal act (as some would lead you to believe) and our Founding Fathers fully intended to allow for the removal of the President for actions which were… well… simply put… egregious… grossly incompetent… grossly negligent… outright distasteful… or, in the case of Barack Hussein Obama, actions which clearly show “malevolence toward this country, which is unabated.” And make no mistake, for those who mistakenly hold the illusion that impeaching Barack Hussein Obama would be a simple matter of “playing politics,” the Founders fully intended that the impeachment of a sitting President be a political act. As C-Span.org notes: “The Congress decides the definition [of impeachable offenses]: by majority vote in the House for impeachment, and by 2/3 vote in the Senate for conviction. The Framers of the Constitution deliberately put impeachment into the hands of the legislative branch rather than the judicial branch, thus transforming it from strictly a matter of legal definition to a matter of political judgment. Then Representative Gerald Ford put it into practical perspective in 1970, when he said an impeachable offense is ‘whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.’” The Obama Administration exemplifies maladministration. It qualifies as the poster-child for bad behavior. Obama and those around him are ravaging this great country and adding a sorry chapter to a noble history. Impeachment, as written in the Constitution, was tailor-made for Barack Hussein Obama and our Founders placed it in our Constitution for such a time as this. It could be easily argued that we have a duty to impeach Barack Hussein Obama. Of course, our elected officials won’t have the back-bone to go it alone. That’s where you come in. Help us spread the word far-and-wide and our elected officials will come to know that Impeachment is the will of the American people and they ignore the will of the people at their own political peril. The question is not whether we should impeach Barack Hussein Obama. Rather, the question is, can we impeach Barack Hussein Obama before it is too late? ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT: Resolved, that Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate: Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, against Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors. Article I In his conduct while President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has:
In doing this, Barack Hussein Obama has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, Barack Hussein Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States. Article II In his conduct while President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, and to that end, through his subordinates and agents, has:
In all of this, Barack Hussein Obama has undermined the integrity of his office, has brought disrepute on the Presidency, has betrayed his trust as President, and has acted in a manner subversive of the rule of law and justice, to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore, Barack Hussein Obama, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States. If you agree with these articles, put your name behind the growing thousands who are fed up with the crimes and lies, and sign the petition. Together we can make our cry heard even in Washington. Posted in Impeach Obama, Corruption And Lies, President Obama, Democratic Party | 5 Comments » Democratic Party News - Millions Unemployed, And Obama Blames Republicans.18. July 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
Well, we saw this one coming. This is Barack Obama’s economy, and it’s his insanely suicidal policies that are preventing job growth. His administration has not saved or generated jobs. The 300 ‘green’ jobs at a lithium battery factory were paid for lock, stock and barrel by your taxes. At last count, these miraculous ‘green’ recovery jobs cost Americans like you and me a bare 500,000 dollars per job. The ugly truth is, . . . millions of jobs have been lost and Americans need real leadership that’s going to work for us, not against us. Posted in Economics, President Obama, Democratic Party | 1 Comment » Democratic Party News - Real Or Fake Jobs?18. July 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
In many ways, the unemployment numbers are much worse than they appear. One factor has been the timing of the US census. The bureau hired some 700,000 workers to collect data, people who otherwise were having a very difficult time navigating the choppy labor markets. They went for the jobs because they were a sure thing, paid decently, and didn’t require unusual skills (anyone can knock on a door and pester people about their private lives). That inflated the jobs number for a while. But now these jobs are at an end — a highly unusual event in government employment, which usually lasts a lifetime. Now all of these people are facing the bracing reality of looking for employment in an economy wrecked by the government. The press has been posting tributes to these people and their jobs and wailing about their fate now that their jobs are vanishing. And that raises questions. If these jobs were so great, why should they be eliminated at all? Surely, there is a way that these people could be transitioned to some other kind of government-funded service? That way, one might reason, people would have jobs, work would get done, and everyone would be better off. Right? Wrong. Census jobs perform no market function, and the wages of these workers are paid by the taxpayer, meaning that these jobs are actually destructive of wealth. They siphon wealth and work out of the private sector into the wasteful sector. In fact, we can go further to say that eliminating these jobs is actually a step toward economic recovery. Given the way economic fallacy has gone viral these days, it seems necessary to explain the issue further. The point of employment is not just jobs; it is productive and economically viable jobs. It would be possible, for example, to reduce unemployment to its bare minimum simply by a mandatory regression in technology. We could abolish the trucking industry and force all freight to be carried by car, thereby creating millions of new jobs. Or we could abolish the car and create even more jobs for people to haul freight around by hand. In each case, the number of jobs created would vastly outnumber the number of jobs lost. But would we be richer as a result? Not in any way. It would amount to a mandatory drop in living standards for everyone. These kinds of policies violate the Hazlitt dictum that part of good economic thinking consists in looking at what is good not just for one group (the unemployed), but all groups in society, and not just for the short term but for the long term. The point of jobs is for people to work towards providing goods and services that are valued by the marketplace. If there is no consumer-driven demand for the things people are doing, their jobs are nothing more than waste. It does nothing for society if everyone is employed building pyramids, contrary to what Keynes once claimed. It would be senseless to have a business that employs thousands to do nothing but break new cellphones and repair them again, or to dig holes and fill them. And why is that? Because there is no economically rational basis for these tasks to exist. To be sure, a wealthy entrepreneur can create a business doing anything, even something that loses money and is even socially ridiculous. But in order to sustain that, he will have to continue to throw good money after bad for an indefinite period of time, even unto the end of time. The day that he decides to stop doing it, the jobs will go away. Of course, no businessman in his right mind wants to do such a thing. If you are going to create and retain uneconomic jobs, there is really only one way to do it: government. The government takes money from the private sector to throw around in inefficient ways, regardless of whether the job is worth doing in the first place. The taxing and debt creation that is necessary to fund the government jobs is extracted from the real engine of wealth creation. This is not only true of census jobs but of all public sector jobs, whether in the federal bureaucracy, the military, or the educational sector. For this reason, the public sector’s payrolls really ought to be excluded from the employment rolls. One objection might be that some of what public jobs produce is actually necessary for long-term economic health. We need an educated society, people might say, and even the results of the census are necessary for private-sector planning. But if that is true, there is no reason why the private sector would not have the incentive to provide these services themselves. And they do in fact. The private sector has ever more sophisticated means for educating its employees, and making up for the inferior products of public schooling. It is the same with the census results, which are used by the state to keep track of us and control us; the private sector has its own methods of assessing demographic concerns over business location and product development. Even if there were government jobs that are in fact productive in their results, they could be performed at a profit instead of by extortion. While everyone obsesses about the plight of census workers, there is a genuine calamity taking place in the private sector, which is being attacked by government every day. This is why the latest jobs numbers show nothing like robust job growth where it matters most. We see only slight overall increases from a decade ago, with boom-time jobs almost entirely wiped out in the bust. This is what needs attention, but not from government programs. We need an absence of government programs, plus dramatic cuts in taxes and regulations of all sorts, and across the board. We need wage reductions in some sectors so that employment can grow in other sectors. Government cannot plan real job growth. It can only get out of the way and let it happen. Written by: Lew Rockwell Posted in Economics, President Obama, Democratic Party | No Comments » Democratic Party News - What Is Socialism?18. July 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
What is socialism? We miss the boat if we say it’s the agenda of those left-wingers and Democrats. According to Marxist doctrine, socialism is a stage of society between capitalism and communism where private ownership and control over property is eliminated. The essence of socialism is the attenuation and ultimate abolition of private property rights. Attacks on private property include, but are not limited to, confiscating the rightful property of one person and giving it to another to whom it doesn’t belong. When this is done privately we call it theft. When it’s done collectively we use the euphemisms: income transfers or redistribution. It’s not just left-wingers and Democrats who call for and admire socialism but right-wingers and Republicans as well. Republicans and right-wingers support taking the earnings of one American and giving them to farmers, banks, airlines and other failing businesses. Democrats and left-wingers support taking the earnings of one American and giving them to poor people, cities, and artists. Both agree on taking one American’s earnings to give to another; they simply differ on the recipients. This kind of congressional activity constitutes at least two-thirds of the federal budget. Regardless of the purpose such behavior is immoral. It’s a reduced form of slavery. After all what is the essence of slavery? It’s the forceful use of one person to serve the purposes of another person. When Congress, through the tax code, takes the earnings of one person and turns around to give it to another person in the forms of prescription drugs, social security, food stamps, farm subsidies or airline bailouts, it is forcibly using one person to serve the purposes of another. The moral question stands out in starker relief when we acknowledge that those spending programs coming out of Congress do not represent lawmakers reaching into their own pockets and sending out the money. Moreover, there’s no Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus giving them the money. The fact that government has no resources of its very own forces us to acknowledge that the only way government can give one American a dollar is to first through intimidation, threats and coercion take that dollar from some other American. Some might rejoin that all of this is a result of a democratic process and it’s legal. Legality alone is no guide for a moral people. There are many things in this world that have been, or are, legal but clearly immoral. Slavery was legal. Did that make it moral? South Africa’s apartheid, Nazi persecution of Jews, Stalinist and Maoist purges were all legal but did that make them moral? Can a moral case be made for taking the rightful property of one American and giving it to another to whom it does not belong? I think not. That’s why socialism is evil. It uses evil means (coercion) to achieve what are seen as good ends (helping people). We might also note that an act that is inherently evil does not become moral simply because there’s a majority consensus. An argument against legalized theft should not be construed as an argument against helping one’s fellow man in need. Charity is a noble instinct; theft legal or illegal is despicable. Or, put another way: reaching into one’s own pocket to assist his fellow man is noble and worthy of praise. Reaching into another person’s pocket to assist one’s fellow man is despicable and worthy of condemnation. For the Christians among us, socialism and the welfare state must be seen as sinful. When God gave Moses the commandment “Thou shalt not steal”, I’m sure He didn’t mean thou shalt not steal unless there’s a majority vote. And, I’m sure that if you asked God if it’s okay just being a recipient of stolen property, He would deem that a sin as well. Written by Walter E. Williams. Posted in Communist Radicals, Marxist Radicals, Marxism, What is Socialism?, Marxist Government, Progressivism, Democratic Party, WakeUp America, Political History, Progressives, Politics | 1 Comment » Democratic Pary News - Obama’s science czar admits Cap-and-Trade is about socialism.8. July 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
Obama’s illegal anti-science czar, John Holdren, is now officially on the record admitting that Obama’s cap-and-tax economic suicide plan (devised by major Obama campaign donors like BP) is about nothing more than “spreading the wealth around.” Holdren insists that it really won’t annihilate our already teetering economy like everyone says, ”it’ll just take mountains of wealth away from our economy and give it to those of developing countries (i.e., global redistribution of wealth). Posted in Progressivism, Cap And Trade, Progressives, Global Warming, President Obama, Socialism In America, Democratic Party | No Comments » Democratic Party News - Minorities and Their Destiny Under Socialism.14. June 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
C.N. Costa and I have been ranting and raving for months about the destructive path the United States are on and the best ways to fix it. However, people are not awake yet. So, out of courtesy, I am going to sound an alarm specifically for them. In order for Marxism to take root in a society, there has to be disenchantment of a large enough portion of the population in their system of government. For the United States, disenchantment really began shortly after the Civil War. Blacks in this country for the longest time simply wanted Equality, which they could have had much earlier were it not for the likes of Woodrow Wilson. You see, Woodrow Wilson is the first real disenchanted President. He was the one who restarted Segregation across the country. It was under Wilson, that Jim Crow laws came to exist and the Supreme Court first uttered the words “Separate, but Equal” about our schools. Woodrow Wilson was the first truly Progressive President, but in reality he was more than that. He would open the door to Fabian Socialism; which is the focus of today’s essay. Progressives are trying to institute many of Karl Marx’s policies, in part because they have no concept of Liberty and Morality, but mostly because they ignore the lessons of History; in particular the Holocaust and the Holodomor. They like to tell you that the reason Socialism and Communism fail is because it hasn’t been tried under the right conditions yet. Marx, himself, believed that it would work best in a country that would have been at one time the very seat of Capitalism. He also believed that in order for it to work, twenty percent of the population must be exterminated. Let’s pause right there for a quick body count. In the United States today, that’s over 60 million people. I know what you are thinking. You are saying right now, “Oh, that would never happen!” Well, let’s take a closer look at how the more than 100 million victims of Marxism have already been murdered–rather, how it “progressed” that far. Hitler didn’t take over Nazi Germany and start the Jewish extermination camps the next day (by the way, those death camps murdered blacks and homosexuals, too). It started with blame. Hitler blamed blacks and Jews for being a drain on society and bleeding the public coffers dry. To him, the Jews were liars and thieves, and blacks were little better than trained monkeys. Hispanics and other tribal half-breeds fared little better, being seriously degenerated from his concept of the perfect Aryan race; they were equally expendable. Hitler was scarcely the only one. Even our friends, the Brits, were taken in by the idea of Eugenics. Eugenics is basically the idea that we could breed the perfect human by removing the parts of the species that were undesirable, like mental illness or disorder, laziness or physical disability. You see in the British system, race was less of an issue, though it was still an issue. Meanwhile, in America, Woodrow Wilson had already singled out the blacks as being diseased, and during both World Wars, violence against German/Jewish immigrants was considered an American Civic Duty. Let that stew in your brain for a moment. The vast majority of the population under Nazi Germany believed that all of the undesirable parts of their society were not hauled off to slaughter. And they weren’t… Not immediately, anyway. First, they were taken to labor camps. Then, they were used for medical experiments, where doctors would surgically implant things like glass windows into their torsos, so the processes of the human body could be observed. Then, the survivors were slaughtered. All the while, the public, under the “wise” tutelage of Joseph Goebbels, was led to believe that the degenerates were finally doing their “fair share” in the labor camps. In the Ukraine, it was a similar story. I won’t bore you with the details, but seven million people died of starvation during the first year of the Holodomor under Soviet Russia. And Mao Tse Tung slaughtered more than seventy million Chinese during his thirty five-odd year reign. Of course, these are all foreigners, none of them are Americans, so that would never happen here, right? In America, we have been subjected to almost one hundred years of propaganda in our schools, most of which was concentrated in the 1960’s and later. We have been taught that the Founding Fathers were racist despite facts like Benjamin Franklin having been the leader of the abolitionist movement in America, and Thomas Jefferson having used Benjamin Banneker as an example of blacks being equal (if not superior) to whites. Progressives love to tell us that our history is wrought with racism and oppression. In truth, like all of the men who died writing our history, it’s spotted with mistakes, not malice. Minorities in this country, blacks and Latinos in particular, need to stop bitching about how they have been oppressed in the past. We have been carrying that baggage around for the last fifty years, and whining about how we can’t make it in America because of racism. So let me ask you this: Is it racism that put Sonia Sotomayor and Clarence Thomas in the Supreme Court? Is it racism that made Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice Secretaries of State? Is it racism that made Geraldo Rivera one of the most well known names in America? What about Denzel Washington or Montel Williams? Was it racism that made Ursula Burns of Xerox or Alvaro de Molina of GMAC their respective companies’ CEOs? Blacks and Latinos are the only groups in America that bought into the bullsh** that the Man was keeping them down. Everyone else looks at the first person to break a barrier (age, race, endurance, etc) as a motivator. Most people believe the old adage “anything you can do, I can do better.” But not us. We are constantly bitching about how we can’t, and it’s white people’s fault. Well, pretty soon, the tables may turn. You see, our two peoples are draining the coffers of the US Treasury, because we won’t get up off our asses and work for our own prosperity. Under Fabian Socialism, that puts us at the top of the list for labor camps and extermination, right behind the die-hard capitalists and the Jews. I see that some of you are still not following the logic. Let me break it down for you: Socialists and Communists want a Utopia without money, suffering and pain. A “New World Order” so to speak. To get there, they have to collapse or overthrow all Capitalist systems. To do that, they need to overwhelm the system with government-funded welfare programs. When the programs fail, they create animosity towards “rich” people for not paying their “fair share”. They then overthrow the system or take over when it collapses and promise “fair” distribution of the resources. At this point, they begin by eliminating those who disagree with them by cultural re-education and extermination. Then, after seeing their new system continuing to struggle under the weight of its own burden, they target those who do not contribute enough to the system. This is the part where Blacks and Latinos come in. You see, we are useful to the revolutionaries while they are destroying America, because they need our enmity and apathy. However, once the system is destroyed, they need productive people to build up their system, otherwise it, too, will fail. When they realize that they have encouraged people to be losers, to drain the system for all it’s worth, they will have to eliminate all that dead weight. Very quickly, we will be niggars and spics once more. This time, there will not be an America to save us from labor and death camps. As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man There are only four things certain since Social Progress began. That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire, And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire; And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins, As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn, The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return! It ends the same way every time. Socialists and Communists want a Utopia without money, suffering and pain. A “New World Order” so to speak. To get there, they have to collapse or overthrow all Capitalist systems. To do that, they need to overwhelm the system with government-funded welfare programs. When the programs fail, they create animosity towards “rich” people for not paying their “fair share”. They then overthrow the system or take over when it collapses and promise “fair” distribution of the resources. At this point, they begin by eliminating those who disagree with them by cultural re-education and extermination. Then, after seeing their new system continuing to struggle under the weight of its own burden, they target those who do not contribute enough to the system. This is the part where Blacks and Latinos come in. You see, we are useful to the revolutionaries while they are destroying America, because they need our enmity and apathy. However, once the system is destroyed, they need productive people to build up their system, otherwise it, too, will fail. When they realize that they have encouraged people to be losers, to drain the system for all it’s worth, they will have to eliminate all that dead weight. Very quickly, we will be spooks and spics once more. This time, there will not be an America to save us from labor and death camps. As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins It ends the same way every time. UPDATE: Look, I understand that this is in fact a worst-case scenario, that would take at least a decade of further upheaval and unrest, however, given the recent spike in anti-Semitism and anti-Capitalism, I would not put this outcome out of the question. There are some extreme times ahead, and a large number of economists foresee a devastating economic collapse coming in 2011, when the Bush tax cuts expire. The real question is: when your 401K is wiped out by the stock market crash, what are you going to do? Will you stand up and decry what Capitalism has done to you, or will you see the truth? These times are being brought on by a government that wants to take care of you from cradle to grave, but what comes with the nanny-state is a total lack of Freedom. The citizens of the United States will become forced labor to a government that obviously no longer has their best interests at heart. Put aside the racial overtones and harsh rhetoric for a moment and ask yourself, do you want to surrender your livelihood and the livelihood of your children and grandchildren so you can reap the benefits from a system that will starve them to death? Whole countries like Greece are burning. France and Germany are right behind them, and the UK is not long to follow. We can still escape the worst that is to come if we decide as a people to swallow the medicine needed to turn this thing around. We must halt all entitlement spending like Medicare and Social Security. We have to stop borrowing money to pay for our wars, and we need to dismantle the Progressive Income Taxes before they bring our economy to a grinding halt. This is the reality of our situation. Socialism does not work. Not in pieces and not in full. The idea of “from each according to his ability and to each according to his need” only works within the confines of the family, because the family has a vested interest in its further success. Government is not so encumbered. The Government has not the slightest care whether or not you or your family carry on. The Government has the torch in that case, and no single family has a sufficient effect on its march. Not in a “Democratic State”, which is why the Founders set up for us a Republic, because in a Republic, the Rights of the Minority are preserved even with the majority. In a Republic, the rights and responsibilities of the Individual are more important than those of the Collective. Written by J. Michael Fuentes Posted in Minorities, Marxism, Latinos, Marxist Radicals, Communist Radicals, Socialism In America, Marxist Government, Democratic Party | 1 Comment » Democratic Party News - The Democratic Party Might Self-destruct.10. June 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
The Democratic Party might self-destruct, for the left is beginning to turn on the Democratic Party administration in Washington. Some of the radical organizations include the communists, hard core socialists, Code Pink, Seiu, etc. Furthermore, President Obama and the other progressive representatives in Washington are now starting to realize the Marxist and Communist radical revolutionaries within their ranks are turning on them, and they can no longer control them. Over the coming months it will be interesting to watch if they continue to tear each other apart. We can only hope it will eventually help cleanse our government of these types of politicians, including their hardcore Marxist and Communist radical revolutionaries they have associated themselves with. One of the most recent examples of this can be seen in the below video as Nancy Pelosi is heckled with having objects thrown at her by Code Pink: Posted in Marxist Government, Nancy Pelosi, Communist Radicals, Marxist Radicals, Progressivism, Progressives, Democratic Party, President Obama, Socialism In America, Federal Government, Politics | 4 Comments » Democratic Party News - Helen Thomas of the Whitehouse Press Corps Tells Jews To Get The Hell Out And Go Back To Germany & Poland.5. June 2010 by Democratic Party News - The News of the Democratic Party.
Helen Thomas of the Whitehouse Press Corps Tells Jews, “Get the Hell Out and go back to Germany & Poland.” This is another prime example of the bias press that is supporting President Obama and his administration. Posted in Whitehouse News, Racism in America, Anti - Israel, President Obama | 1 Comment » |
